{"id":325,"date":"2022-02-26T14:55:00","date_gmt":"2022-02-26T14:55:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/engadget.vip\/?p=325"},"modified":"2022-02-26T14:55:00","modified_gmt":"2022-02-26T14:55:00","slug":"acer-xf270hu-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/engadget.vip\/?p=325","title":{"rendered":"Acer XF270HU Review"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class='booster-block booster-read-block'><\/div><\/p>\n<h2>Pros<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Good overall image quality<\/li>\n<li>AMD Freesync works well<\/li>\n<li>144Hz makes for great gaming<\/li>\n<li>Excellent value<\/li>\n<li>Better connectivity than G-Sync alternatives<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Cons<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Image quality slightly trails the best<\/li>\n<li>Design is mundane<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id=\"review-key-specifications\">Key Specifications<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Review Price: \u00a3390.00<\/li>\n<li>27in, 2,560 x 1,440 display<\/li>\n<li>IPS LCD panel<\/li>\n<li>144Hz refresh rate, 4ms response time<\/li>\n<li>100% sRGB<\/li>\n<li>AMD FreeSync<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id=\"what-is-the-acer-xf270hu\">What is the Acer XF270HU?<\/h2>\n<p>The past year or so has seen the arrival of some truly exciting gaming monitors. This is a result of the combination of new, high-refresh-rate IPS LCD panels with either AMD FreeSync and Nvidia G-Sync adaptive sync technologies. <\/p>\n<p>The headline-grabbers have been the top-end G-Sync models, such as the Acer Predator XB271HU and X34A, and the Asus ROG Swift PG279Q and PG348Q. However, also available are slightly less flashy but equally capable AMD FreeSync models, such as the Acer XF270HU. <\/p>\n<p>It boasts a 27in IPS panel with a 2,560 x 1,440 resolution, a 144Hz refresh rate and a fully adjustable stand, and it\u2019s at least \u00a3150 cheaper than its G-Sync-equipped sibling.\u00a0 Does that make it the gaming monitor bargain of the year?<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"acer-xf270hu\">Acer XF270HU \u2013 Design and Features<\/h2>\n<p>One thing you may have noticed if you follow Acer\u2019s product announcements is that the XF270HU\u2019s name doesn\u2019t include the Predator brand. This seems to have become a bit of a trend among monitor manufacturers at the moment, with G-Sync models being given top billing and the FreeSync alternatives being treated as lesser beings. <\/p>\n<p><strong>Related: Best Monitors 2016<\/strong><br \/><\/img><\/p>\n<p>However, from a practical perspective, there\u2019s very little &#8220;lesser&#8221; about the XF270HU. But the same can&#8217;t be said when it comes to the design; it\u2019s pretty obvious that not all of the \u00a3150 price difference between the XF270HU and the XB271HU is down to the cost of a G-Sync chip.<\/p>\n<p>The XF270HU is pretty plain-looking, with a simple design that\u2019s finished in a dull matte plastic. Overall, its build quality also appears a little less refined.<\/p>\n<p>For instance, its bezels are fairly wide and stand proud of the screen. On the Predator models, the bezels are far narrower and sit almost flush with the screen. <\/p>\n<p>This slightly cheap approach also extends to the stand. While it boasts a full complement of adjustments \u2013 height, tilt, rotation and pivot \u2013 all the movements are a little stiff. All except rotation, where the monitor is mounted on a flimsy spinning plastic disc, rather than having a fixed base and a rotation mechanism between the base and stand.<\/p>\n<p>So first impressions aren\u2019t great, but look beyond the styling and the XF270HU has many hidden talents.\u00a0 <\/p>\n<p><\/img><\/p>\n<p>For a start, it has better connectivity than any G-Sync alternative. Instead of featuring one HDMI and one DisplayPort, it has both plus a DVI port too. Okay, so this isn&#8217;t much use for multiple devices \u2013 a second HDMI would\u2019ve been far more useful \u2013 but technically it&#8217;s still a better selection. You also get a USB 3.0 hub with two ports on the back and two conveniently located on the left side.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, the Acer XF270HU uses an IPS LCD panel, so viewing angles should be fantastic. In addition, Acer claims 100% coverage of the sRGB colour space, so overall colour accuracy should be pretty decent too. <\/p>\n<p>Then there are the gaming features. AMD FreeSync should take care of screen tearing and stutter, while a maximum 144Hz refresh rate matches the majority of existing TN panel-based gaming monitors. <\/p>\n<p>Some rivals can refresh a little faster, but the difference between 144Hz and anything higher is almost imperceptible. Like other fast-refresh IPS panels, the XF270HU has a response time of only 4ms, compared to 1ms for some gaming TN panels \u2013 but again, for most users this difference will be barely noticeable. <\/p>\n<p>Elsewhere, there&#8217;s a pair of 3W speakers, plus you also get a DVI cable, a DisplayPort cable and a UBS 3.0 cable in the box.<\/p>\n<p><\/img><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"acer-xf270hu1\">Acer XF270HU \u2013 Setup and OSD<\/h2>\n<p>The XF270HU requires a bit of assembly before you can fire it up, with the base screwing onto the stand and the monitor clipping on top. Attaching the base is a bit fiddly, but it\u2019s a fairly painless process: at 69 x 6 x 38cm and 7kg, the monitor isn\u2019t too big and unwieldy \u2013 unlike 30in+ alternatives. <\/p>\n<p>You can also opt to forego the stand supplied here and instead fit the monitor to an arm or alternative stand via its standard 100 x 100mm VESA mount. Note that the power supply is internal, so there\u2019s no power brick for which to find a home.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, setting up the display physically is easy enough, thanks to the various adjustments in its stand. Some other displays offer a bit more flexibility, but at least you don\u2019t have to resort to stacking up a few books to get the display up to a reasonable height \u2013 as is common with the cheapest of gaming displays. <\/p>\n<p>As for choosing colour settings and the like, the Acer has an OSD menu controlled via a row of buttons on the front-right of the bezel. The control system is intuitive, but a little slow and clunky compared to the best I\u2019ve used. Thankfully, there isn\u2019t too much need to use it since image quality out of the box is pretty decent.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Pros Good overall image quality AMD Freesync works well 144Hz makes for great gaming Excellent value Better connectivity than G-Sync alternatives Cons Image quality slightly trails the best Design is mundane Key Specifications Review Price: \u00a3390.00 27in, 2,560 x 1,440 display IPS LCD panel 144Hz refresh rate, 4ms response time 100% sRGB AMD FreeSync What [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":326,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[295,13,14,15,16,12],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/engadget.vip\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/engadget.vip\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/engadget.vip\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/engadget.vip\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/engadget.vip\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=325"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/engadget.vip\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/325\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/engadget.vip\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/326"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/engadget.vip\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=325"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/engadget.vip\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=325"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/engadget.vip\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=325"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}